The only one I've seen even a part of is Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot, and Ebert nailed it - "moronic beyond comprehension."Jeff
For some reason, repeats a citation of CHARLIE'S ANGELS, at worst a harmless trifle with a solid primary cast, from the first list.
Jeff, you're ahead of the game. The others in this set are largely pretty sad. I'll take SERIAL MOM every day of the week over PINK FLAMINGOS, and that's about the only arguable one (aside from CA).
I was about to note the same thing as Todd: it's really only 14 more movies because Charlie's Angels is in the original post of 22.That being said, I sure miss ol' Roger.
I miss him,e too, Deb. And I liked Charlie's Angels.
I used to study his annual guides and seek out the four stars. Once I found those flicks I oftentimes couldn't agree with his rating.
I've seen four of this movies and Roger is right: they suck. I'll assume the rest are just as dreadful. And, like Deb, I miss Roger.
Post a Comment
7 comments:
The only one I've seen even a part of is Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot, and Ebert nailed it - "moronic beyond comprehension."
Jeff
For some reason, repeats a citation of CHARLIE'S ANGELS, at worst a harmless trifle with a solid primary cast, from the first list.
Jeff, you're ahead of the game. The others in this set are largely pretty sad. I'll take SERIAL MOM every day of the week over PINK FLAMINGOS, and that's about the only arguable one (aside from CA).
I was about to note the same thing as Todd: it's really only 14 more movies because Charlie's Angels is in the original post of 22.
That being said, I sure miss ol' Roger.
I miss him,e too, Deb. And I liked Charlie's Angels.
I used to study his annual guides and seek out the four stars. Once I found those flicks I oftentimes couldn't agree with his rating.
I've seen four of this movies and Roger is right: they suck. I'll assume the rest are just as dreadful. And, like Deb, I miss Roger.
Post a Comment