![](http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4097/94/320/bcon001.jpg)
Didn't happen, of course, but that's not the point. The point is that the collection was a best seller, as was The Cape Cod Lighter, which I've been reading for a couple of days. It's a collection of stories published in 1962. The copy I have is the Bantam paperback edition, the third printing from 1969. The Random House hardcover went through five printings between November 1962 and February 1963. A short story collection. Hard to believe, right? And these aren't just short stories. They're New Yorker short stories. What in God's name was the reading public thinking? I'm sure this couldn't happen now. Tastes have changed, and hardly anybody reads O'Hara anymore. He's out of favor with the people who decide on the literary canon, and that's a shame, because he was a heck of a writer. Great insight into characters, great ear for dialogue, and he knew how to put together a story.
Even more entertaining than the stories is the introduction. O'Hara clobbers critics and talks about the importance of fiction. Great stuff.
2 comments:
Tastes have changed, and hardly anybody reads O'Hara anymore.
I do, Bill. A few years back I discovered O'Hara too and read through all the stories I could find - close to 300 in the end.
Great stuff.
Yes, Bill, don't let Mike Robison see that you've written that no one reads O'Hara any longer...when I was writing a Lot on Rara-Avis, but not as much as Miker, he was very enthusiastically boosting him, having, I think, just discovered his novels (has Mike learned to love short fiction yet? I just don't read enough on RA of late...). I did recommend JO to a librarian looking to help a patron who'd gone through all of Hemingway and was looking for more in some way in the same vein...along with Hammett, and JDMac, among a few others.
Post a Comment